“The microbial environment deep beneath the seafloor may provide a
window into how organisms could survive in places beyond Earth” (Meyer, 2012)
Deep sea
exploration presents different challenges more than answers, however the
fascinating hidden microbial world of deepest side of the ocean is an
interesting topic to research life on Earth. Different questions remain to be
answered and are key to understand the microbial component on this hostile
environment, how deep are found microbial forms on the sea? What are the patterns in the distribution,
diversity and dominance of functional and taxonomic groups of bacteria at the
vast ocean seafloor? What is the role of microbial component on biogeochemical
cycles on the seafloor? Are bacterial communities in symbiosis with different
host animals? And how is it possible to
maintain functions in microbial cells at an energy flux that barely allows cell
growth over tens to thousands of years?1. All these
enigmas could be resolved using exploration technology and molecular techniques
for revel microbial deep sea mysteries.
The deep sea
floor is widely regarded as the largest ecosystem on Earth 2,
covering around 65% of the planet’s surface 3. The
world’s oceans are teeming with microscopic life forms where bacteria, archaea,
protists, and unicellular fungi account for most of the oceanic biomass 4. Besides the hostile environment of deep-sea,
there are diverse landscapes of canyons, cold seeps, deep-water coral reefs,
mud volcanoes, carbonate mounds, brine pools, gas hydrates, seamounts, ridges,
fractures and trenches that are host to rich microbial communities1 (Figure 1) with
several adaptations for resist environmental conditions, using it’s metabolic
mechanisms.
Figure
1. Microbial ecosystems. A)
Microbial mat at Haakon Mosby Mud Volcano. B) A methanotrophic microbial reef
of the Black Sea. C) Microbial mat above oily sediments. D) Microbial mat on an
asphalt flow. Taken from Jørgensen and Boetius, 2006.
The deepest bacteria and the deep sea diversity
Exist
different reports of deepest microorganism recovered from this environments,
for example Shewanella benthica KT99
was found on sediments on Tonga‐Kermadec Trench, Pacific at 9000 m!. Other reports (Table 1)
include the genus Psychromonas sp.
CNPT3 from Central North Pacific at 5800m, Shewanella
violacea DSS12 located on sediment on Ryukyu Trench, Philippine Sea at 5110
m and other bacterias belonging to Shewanella
genus 5. The
most abundant microorganism of deeps sea sediments are barophilic and psychrophilic
bacteria, such as some members of the Moritella,
Colwellia and Shewanella clades.
On the hydrothermal vents predominate thermophilic archaeal members of the
orders Thermococcales, Methanococcales,
Archaeoglobales, Aquificales, and
mesophilic and thermophilic bacterial members of Epsilon-proteobacteria have been detected (Zhang 2016). Microorganism from cool seeps oxidize
hydrocarbon compounds by using oxygen or sulphate as the terminal electron
acceptor like Methanosarcinales, the dominant anaerobic methanotrophs 6and
sulphate-reducing bacteria of the Desulfosarcina
(Desulfococcus) or Desulfobulbus
groups7,8 however cool
seeps microorganism have not been cultivated, representing a new challenge for
microbiologist to develop new culture media for recover deep sea bacterias.
An
interesting studio determinate the composition for microbial communities of 27
deep-sea surface sediment samples (Figure 2) from all major ocean regions
focused on the zone between 1000–5300 m water depth, representative of 70% of
the depth distribution of the global deep-sea floor 9 .
The main conclusion of the study was that deep-sea sediments are inhabited by a
core community of few cosmopolitan, abundant bacterial which are affiliated
with the JTB255 marine benthic group (class Gammaproteobacteria,
order Xanthomonadales) and the OM1 clade (class Actinobacteria,
order Acidimicrobiales), where bacterial communities appears to be
geographically restricted. Despite the advances, the other 30% of the sediments
remains unexplored, especially South America oceans, touching the frontier of
knowledge and open a new opportunity to explore the deep sea sediments and
bacterial communities associated with different tools as a video-guided in situ
analytical instruments and robots to operate and recovering diverse environmental
samples.
Figure 2. Community composition of bacterial communities in deep-sea sediment. Taken by Bienhold et al. 2016
Table 1. Different record of microorganism found on deep sea sediments and the depth for each study. Taken from Sieze and Wilson, 2009.
Biogeochemical cycles and deep sea bacteria
Microorganisms
are responsible for 98% of primary production and mediate biogeochemical cycles
in the oceans4. Bacteria and
archaea drive many fundamental processes in marine sediment, including
oxidation of organic matter, production of methane and other hydrocarbons, and
removal of sulfate from the ocean 10. For other hand, deep-sea hydrothermal plumes have potential microbial
energy sources such as H2S, Fe, Mn, CH4, and H2 11. These metals are scavenging and oxidate by microorganisms and
by binding with organic matter, which is presumably derived from microbial
activity 11,12. The bacterial communities plays important role on carbon cycling due
to decomposition of material on the deep-sea bed, consuming at least 13–30% of the total
biological consumption of organic carbon13, furthermore, the microorganisms mediate hemosynthetic fixation of
carbon 11 and have different enzymes that
break organic material and incorporate it for their metabolism 14, however, the fluxes of hydrocarbons throughout the
water column, the amount of organic material that are accessible to microbial degradation and the timescale
of several process where fractions are digested, oxidized and assimilated remain unknown. Future investigation on the relationship between microbial activity
and organic matter degradation will provide a better understanding of the
impact of this micro world on the deep sea equilibrium, and in situ environmental conditions measurements
are necessary for answer this questions. Biogeochemical processes
in deep sea sediments can be studied using independent underwater modules that
are placed by submersibles and that autonomously measure and record data
electronically1
Adaptation process
The mechanisms by which marine bacteria adapt to different extreme
conditions of temperature, pressure and high concentration of certain metals are
very inadequately understood, however, some research have determinate that regulated
genes, key for different metabolic process, are responsible for acclimatization in marine bacteria15. Metatranscriptomic analysis serve as a tool to
determinate the gene expression patterns of these microbial groups and their metabolic
arsenal for resist hostile conditions. A study revel that deep sea bacteria have
a high ratio of rRNA operon copies per genome size, highlighted a high degree
of gene regulation to respond rapidly to environmental changes5,16. Moreover, the deep sea microorganism have the
capability to produce several enzymes related to biocatalysts with properties like high salt tolerance,
hyperthermostability, barophilicity and cold adaptivity 17, provide an enormous reservoir of low-temperature and
high-pressure adapted enzymes5. They also contain a larger repertoire of transport proteins and
different proteins that are encoded for chemotaxis, flagellar assembly and
motor function to allow them to hunt for dissolved organic matter18,19. Despite the recent research, several gaps about the
functions and the structure of different enzymes exists, for these reasons is
imperative the use of Metaproteomic and Metatranscriptomic analysis, and other
independent culture proxies to study metabolic mechanisms of deep sea microbial
communities.
The unexplored
Symbiosis
On nature, symbiosis is the common denominator,
however on the deep sea little is known about this phenomenon. An example is
the chemolithoautotrophic microorganisms, the primary producers at hydrothermal
vents. Diverse animals like mollusks, giant tubeworms, and shrimps depend on
the energy flow through these chemoautotrophs, furthermore, the bacterial consortium
control rates of redox reactions, modifying the environment and allow that
animals to have energy access more easily1. Other animals like bivalves and tubeworms maintain a
symbiosis with chemolithoautotrophic Aquificales and diverse alpha- and gammaproteobacteria20, similarly occurs with deep sea
corals, however the symbiotic microbial biosphere remain poorly studied despite bacteria provide several services
beneficial to holobiont health, such cycling nutrients, antibiotic production21 and
the exclusion of pathogens through occupation of available microbial niches 22,23 maintaining
holobiont fitness. A research
about bacterial community structure associated with deep-sea corals from the
Red Sea stablish that corals exhibited species-specific bacterial
associations provide support to the notion that bacteria contribute to
environmental adaption of their coral hosts24. It´s necessary study these
relationships because the microbial communities on host evolution are fundamental
to understand physiological mechanism and the behave of holobiont as a whole. Technological
advances on molecular biology and exploration robots provide new opportunities
to address these questions.
References
1. Jørgensen, B. B. & Boetius, A. Feast and famine —
microbial life in the deep-sea bed. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5,
770–781 (2007).
2. Webb, T. J., Berghe,
E. V. & O’Dor, R. Biodiversity’s Big Wet Secret: The Global Distribution of
Marine Biological Records Reveals Chronic Under-Exploration of the Deep Pelagic
Ocean. PLOS ONE 5, e10223 (2010).
3. Danovaro, R. et
al. Exponential Decline of Deep-Sea Ecosystem Functioning Linked to Benthic
Biodiversity Loss. Curr. Biol. 18, 1–8 (2008).
4. Sogin, M. L. et
al. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare
biosphere”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 12115–12120 (2006).
5. Siezen Roland J.
& Wilson Greer. Genomics of deep‐sea and sub‐seafloor microbes. Microb.
Biotechnol. 2, 157–163 (2009).
6. Orphan, V. J., House,
C. H., Hinrichs, K.-U., McKeegan, K. D. & DeLong, E. F. Multiple archaeal
groups mediate methane oxidation in anoxic cold seep sediments. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. 99, 7663–7668 (2002).
7. Michaelis, W. et
al. Microbial reefs in the Black Sea fueled by anaerobic oxidation of
methane. Science 297, 1013–1015 (2002).
8. Niemann, H. et al.
Novel microbial communities of the Haakon Mosby mud volcano and their role as a
methane sink. Nature 443, 854 (2006).
9. Bienhold, C., Zinger,
L., Boetius, A. & Ramette, A. Diversity and Biogeography of Bathyal and
Abyssal Seafloor Bacteria. PLOS ONE 11, e0148016 (2016).
10. Kallmeyer, J.,
Pockalny, R., Adhikari, R. R., Smith, D. C. & D’Hondt, S. Global
distribution of microbial abundance and biomass in subseafloor sediment. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 16213–16216 (2012).
11. Dick, G. J. et al.
The microbiology of deep-sea hydrothermal vent plumes: ecological and
biogeographic linkages to seafloor and water column habitats. Front.
Microbiol. 4, (2013).
12. Holden, J. F., Breier,
J. A., Rogers, K. L., Schulte, M. D. & Toner, B. M. Biogeochemical
processes at hydrothermal vents: microbes and minerals, bioenergetics, and
carbon fluxes. Oceanography 25, 196–208 (2012).
13. Rowe, G. T. &
Deming, J. W. The role of bacteria in the turnover of organic carbon in
deep-sea sediments. J. Mar. Res. 43, 925–950 (1985).
14. Turley, C. Bacteria in
the cold deep-sea benthic boundary layer and sediment—water interface of the NE
Atlantic. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 33, 89–99 (2000).
15. Karna Radjasa, O.
Deep-sea bacteria and their biotechnological potentials. J. Coast. Dev. 7,
109–118 (2004).
16. Lauro, F. M. &
Bartlett, D. H. Prokaryotic lifestyles in deep sea habitats. Extremophiles
12, 15–25 (2008).
17. Debashish, G., Malay,
S., Barindra, S. & Joydeep, M. Marine enzymes. in Marine Biotechnology I
189–218 (Springer, 2005).
18. Azam, F. & Long,
R. A. Oceanography: Sea snow microcosms. Nature 414, 495–498
(2001).
19. Kiørboe, T. &
Jackson, G. A. Marine snow, organic solute plumes, and optimal chemosensory
behavior of bacteria. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 1309–1318 (2001).
20. Christie, D. M.,
Fisher, C. R., Lee, S.-M. & Givens, S. Back-arc Spreading Systems:
Geological, Biological, Chemical, and Physical Interactions. Wash. DC Am.
Geophys. Union Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 166, (2006).
21. Kvennefors, E. C. E.,
Sampayo, E., Ridgway, T., Barnes, A. C. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Bacterial
Communities of Two Ubiquitous Great Barrier Reef Corals Reveals Both Site- and
Species-Specificity of Common Bacterial Associates. PLoS ONE 5,
(2010).
22. van de Water, J. A. J.
M. et al. Comparative Assessment of Mediterranean Gorgonian-Associated
Microbial Communities Reveals Conserved Core and Locally Variant Bacteria. Microb.
Ecol. 73, 466–478 (2017).
23. Rohwer, F., Seguritan,
V., Azam, F. & Knowlton, N. Diversity and distribution of coral-associated
bacteria. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 243, 1–10 (2002).
24. Röthig, T., Yum, L.
K., Kremb, S. G., Roik, A. & Voolstra, C. R. Microbial community
composition of deep-sea corals from the Red Sea provides insight into functional
adaption to a unique environment. Sci. Rep. 7, 44714 (2017).
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario